Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Internet Search
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
General Discussions
The Watercooler
What, if anything, could he be charged with?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Shari" data-source="post: 209225" data-attributes="member: 1848"><p>Nope, still no apology. And nephew doesn't come too close to me, but he will come around husband.</p><p>***</p><p>Nephew is the grandson of my in-law's. The in-laws (Two Brooms and company) are the ones who treat me and my kids like dirt. husband, nephew, and easy child 2 are the "golden children" and do no wrong. I had already toyed with the idea of boycotting holidays there, but its past toying now. I said my piece to them over a year ago when Two Brooms went behind our backs and helped easy child 2 hide new clothes she wasn't supposed to have yet. I put the ball in their court, and they chose not to play. I am not getting involved with this other than, if need be, I will say I support easy child 1's decision because I agree with him. Nephew is learning to walk on us, in part, because that's what his grandparents are teaching him.</p><p>***</p><p>easy child 1 is not certain if the in-laws are aware of the entire situation (beleive me, it won't matter). While they are jerks to him (and the rest of us), he feels its only fair to give them a point-blank explanation of his decision - if they ask, of course (and I'm sure they will). What they choose to do with it is up to them. My bet is, they will continue to coddle nephew and oust us - but so be it. But easy child wants to give them an explanation and an opportunity so he can go to bed at night knowing he did the best he could. I do applaud that.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Shari, post: 209225, member: 1848"] Nope, still no apology. And nephew doesn't come too close to me, but he will come around husband. *** Nephew is the grandson of my in-law's. The in-laws (Two Brooms and company) are the ones who treat me and my kids like dirt. husband, nephew, and easy child 2 are the "golden children" and do no wrong. I had already toyed with the idea of boycotting holidays there, but its past toying now. I said my piece to them over a year ago when Two Brooms went behind our backs and helped easy child 2 hide new clothes she wasn't supposed to have yet. I put the ball in their court, and they chose not to play. I am not getting involved with this other than, if need be, I will say I support easy child 1's decision because I agree with him. Nephew is learning to walk on us, in part, because that's what his grandparents are teaching him. *** easy child 1 is not certain if the in-laws are aware of the entire situation (beleive me, it won't matter). While they are jerks to him (and the rest of us), he feels its only fair to give them a point-blank explanation of his decision - if they ask, of course (and I'm sure they will). What they choose to do with it is up to them. My bet is, they will continue to coddle nephew and oust us - but so be it. But easy child wants to give them an explanation and an opportunity so he can go to bed at night knowing he did the best he could. I do applaud that. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
General Discussions
The Watercooler
What, if anything, could he be charged with?
Top