Even in situations where the school is doing its utmost to help you and working with you, a school evaluation is only approximate at best. I'm talking around the world here... the system is slightly different here in Australia where the schools are financed and run by the state, but Special Education funding is paid for by the federal government. So schools actually like to get good reports that can then be used to apply for more money from the federal government. But even so - it looks smelly to the federal government if a school is able to get a much larger amount of funding than the school down the road. Unless there is a big difference in the demographic ie difficult child 3's correspondence school has a very high proportion of Special Needs students and so they can generally justify a higher level of funding applications. So even here, it is not in a school's interests for THE SCHOOL to produce a report detailing a child's issues down to the nth degree; the school can give a broader approximation and the parent can then take things further privately if they wish, and the schools here will generally be supportive of whatever they can find.
So wherever you are in the world - by all means get a report from the school, but especially with younger children, the school's assessment is likely to miss the mark. Often widely.
WHat we've done in the past - we took the school's assessment (get sub-scores and more detailed report if possible; if necessary, get the school to send it direct to the therapist or neuropsychologist of your choice) and then had an expert look at it privately. That private expert then said, "These scores here and here are OK; but with this report, I know I need to examine here and here." It made it cheaper for us than if we had gone private to begin with.
We did find that the school counsellor (generally trained in psychology but not to any great extent) would refuse to give the detailed reports to anyone but a fully trained psychologist or psychiatrist. With difficult child 1, we had to get the private psychiatrist request the detailed report. He then gave us a copy.
On accuracy - every time we've had a school counsellor's report on any of our kids, it has only been a rough approximation and at times has got it badly wrong. For example, if you have a child with splinter skills or with learning difficulties, then the sub-scores of an IQ test will have wide gaps. Our kids scored low for coding (I remember difficult child 1 scored 6) and scored high (17) in other areas. But the school counsellor ignored (or didn't know) the rules on grading these wide disparities, and averaged out all the sub-scores to give one final IQ score. Every. Freakin'. Time. And the guidelines say that where tere are wide disparities in the sub-scores, they should not be averaged. What you should say, is that there were wide disparities and these indicate splinter skills - areas of high need coupled with high ability. Both these need support. B ut average it out and g=you get a report with the following statement: "the child is actually performing rmarkably well considering his IQ is only barely above average/is borderline". With difficult child 1's first IQ test, he was unable to complete it because he was so anxious and fidgetty. But his school counsellor scored the test as if he had done it all, then averaged it out, told me he was retarded and then said, "If a kid whp is retarded is still performing in tests as well as he is, that proves you are pushing him far too hard - I've been telling you that you are a pushy mother and need to back off, YOU are the cause of anxiety in this child."
She was so wrong on so many counts, but the school at that time had a vested interest in discrediting me and accusing my kids of being clever parrots rather than genuinely bright.
I've dealt with four or five different schools, and with even more school counsellors (who are generally teachers who decided to specialise and did a course of sorts in psychology). Even the kindest, most supportive of school counsellors has never seemed to me to be more than basically competent.
I think the most telling example (and I have many examples) was when difficult child 3 was at the end of Grade 5. A couple of months before the end of Grade 5, I responded to a request for subjects in a research study, some psychology Masters students were tying to develop a method of testing non-verbal autistic kids for IQ. To that end, they needed high-functioning autistic kids to test across a broad range, and they were then going to look at the non-verbal component of those tests to see if they correlated. As a result, as part of this study, difficult child 3 had a very detailed, comprehensive psychometric assessment done. They gave us his IQ score provisionally, because of his splinter skills (ie they did not average out the whole lot) but said that even if they did average it all out, he was scoring at about 140 (they even gave confidence limits - plus or minus 6). There were several test systems where he scored way below average, and these connected directly to his autism; these were "artificial lows", we were told. Not accurate indicators of his intelligence, only of the degree of impairment at that point, likely to improve as his brain matures.
I gave the school a copy of the report. But nobody passed it on to the school counsellor as I requested, because two months later she did her own repeat testing on difficult child 3 (without my knowledge or permission - due to recent testing I would have vetoed it, tests should not be repeated within 18 months to two years). She then told me (schoolroom steps, "I'm glad I caught you," which was hardly professional either), "He did well really, he scored 105 when I tested him which tells me we're worrying too much about trying to extend him. He's only a little above average, he's doing well for an average kid."
She was shocked and disbelieving when I told her of the much higher score two months earlier, from more qualified practitioners. I said to her, "There were some high scores and low scores in your testing, weren't there?"
She said, "Of course."
I said, "Go back and read the rules on how to score those tests. When the gaps are more than a certain amount, you do not average them out for a single number."
She said, "But the Department insists on a single number." (not sure if that is true - any more, anyway). "That is what you are supposed to do."
We didn't achieve consensus.
difficult child 3's current Special Education teacher is a gem. The school's Special Education department (rapidly growing) are wonderful. I wish I could clone them and seed the world. They've heard my stories. They agree with me. I'm hoping (but I'm a Pollyanna!) that they are the way of the future of educational psychology in our country.
But it is such a huge job, and there is such a long way to go.
Marg