Guess this is a topic in a lot of our homes. My heart goes out to Cho's parents - they are dealing not only with the grief of the loss of their own son, but also the unimaginable grief of knowing their son caused the same pain for 32 other families.
None of us can know what challenges they faced and I do not for a second think the question can be asked here "where were the parents?" This man was a 23 yo adult, living on campus, sending up enough red flags (in hindsight) to worry professors and peers who were on-site, and yet he was still able to carry out his plan.
There were two cases in the last year or 2 of universities who "uninvited" students to return because they were being treated for depression. There's a slippery slope here - are we going to deny college educations to all students being treated, or *not* treated, for depression because of some vague, unsubstantiated potential for violence? Are we going to penalize those who *do* get treatment? Who has the wisdom to determine which adult is truly a danger and which isn't? And realistically, until Monday, Cho didn't demonstrate anything more than very seriously odd behavior. He had already been evaluated, and released. Had he not committed this crime, none of us would have ever known of him, he would more than likely have continued to not receive treatment, he would have graduated and moved on.... how many other Cho's are in our communities, disturbed people who haven't (yet) committed violent acts? Do we force lock up because of the potential? That's not the standard of treatment today and I think it's unlikely that standard will or should change.
How many of us have gone to school offices with- concerns about their kids' potential for violence, and how many of us have been brushed off? And how many of us have kids who at one time time (or more) have been judged a "danger to themselves or others" yet they're not in a locked facility today?
As with Columbine, this is a "there but for the grace" moment in our home. More than with Columbine though, it has brought home to husband and I that in a few short years, our ability to intervene, seek, demand treatment for thank you will be cut off. Our ability to protect him and protect the community will be extremely limited.
I don't know what the answer is, weighing the rights of "adults" to self determination, knowing that severe mental illness in my humble opinion almost cancels out appropriate self determination, but also recognizing that without overt signs of imminent danger, a parent's gut feeling about the health of their adult child's mental state is not going to get any attention from anyone.
It's just an incredibly tragic and sad situation.