I can see how it could easily be true for a search for chloroform, murder, etc... would be on someone's history. Heck, the very week that they were first talkign about the searches in court, my browsing history would have shown defenestration. I heard it as a way to kill people on an episode of CSI. I had no idea what it meant so I googled it. I have also googled all sorts of things just by being caught in info overload - you see something, search, that leads to something else, etc....
This would have had NO impact on my decision. For me the plain truth is that you don't put the body of someone you love in a plastic bag, suitcase, tote, trunk, etc..... Dr G testified that research shows that the ONLY time you find a child in a container like that is if someone killed them. Well, or you are my Aunt H and when you got your husband's ashes from the funeral home you took them out of the container and put them in a neatly labeled ziplock bag in the filing cabinet in your basement - filed under his name, of course. (No, I am NOT joking. The entire family thought it was a joke but she took me down to see them once. This little old lady did NOT play jokes, much less ones that would be, in her mind, disrespectful to her husband's remains! (yes, you can laugh insanely now. She was an incredible tightwad and the container he was in was too pretty to store ashes in. So she put flowers in it and gave it to her nephew (other side of the family) and his wife as a housewarming.
But that was AFTER the funeral, etc....
Bodies just are not found in bags or containers like that unless it is murder. That and her behavior alone are what convinces me that she is guilty. The tattoo that was gotten shortly after Caylee went missing that was a "memorial" to the baby, and never asking about her, only being concerned when SHE was the topic of conversation in a good way are what convinced me.