buddy
New Member
at 8:30. Our home Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) psychiatric, the school psychiatric (ugg), the psychiatric we hired to do the FBA and .... ta da..... the high school psychiatric. I walked right up to her and said, who are you and what are you doing here? the sp ed coordinator quickly (before my legal rep walked in... she is a-scaaard of her I think) said who she was and said since Q is to go to this high school next year we thought it would be good for her to be involved in this for transition. Whatever.... he everything changes every few months. Maybe INTSTEAD of our school psychiatric??? How many licensed psychologists does it take to write a decent pbip?.....LOL
SO, they had us go thru the old fba and behavior plan (well OLD in that we did it at the end of last school year... not really so many months doing the new bip) and there were plenty of opportunities for me to correct the psychiatric. Independent psychiatric asked if he had ever had a conditional procedure...guess what school psychiatric said... LAST year that Q went after him so he grabbed him and held him for 5 minutes. I said, really, do I have a copy of that?? He said I called you it was on a Friday and blah blah. IF he did, he never said that it was a restraint. I NEVER got a written report about that EVER. I am good about that stuff. Laywer was all over that and NOT happy and asked sp ed coordinator to get that right away so they are getting his documentation which during the meeting he admitted he likely never wrote up. This is the same guy that said that he grabbed Q by the arm and told him he was not going anywhere and was suggesting to the Speech Language Pathologist (SLP) to do that before lunch... I told him he was nuts that if he aggressed on Q like tha the owuld aggress on me like that too. YOu should have seen the eyes on the two other psychs!
HE is also the psychiatric that shoved Q into a chair in front of me... that is THREE times he has admitted to, how many more times did it happen I dont know about? They all admitted they ahve never held Q down that they have had to deflect him a little but he can always be herded to wherever he needs to go if needed.
I think this independent person is getting my point that they are egging him on. OUR psychiatric said to the team, what he feels is important to get on record is that this is not a child with up and down mental health issues that will get better with certain medications etc... He is permanently brain injured and we need to not have to keep coming to the table trying to explain that to people. I was beside myself happy that we are spending our waiver monies on this guy... HE IS SOOOO GOOD. THEy went thru the functions of behavior and she looked at it and said, yeah, I can see that these things can be a part but this is a complex kid and he is also probably just doing what his brain makes him do.... not really a function to it. OMGOSH! How many times have I tried to tell people that???
The law person said that she wanted it on record that I had called her in because I felt that there were some people in the school working at odds with the plan and being overly zealous about behaviors that were not hte target behaviors we were working on and things were being made worse because of it so she wanted it clear that when we did this ALL people had to come to the meetings and be a part of this. SP ed coordinator said oh and he WANTS to be a part of it and law person said in front of everyone, I highly doubt that. (NO he was not there today of course)
The documents that they passed out had words and things we had taken out before I signed the significant change. AT the end of the meeting I aske dht eteacher and coordinator about that and they said, yeah htey saw that too an it would be taken out. It said he had tried to expose himself... that has NEVER happened... they were at one time saying what IF he tried that. and they tried to put in a bunch of if his words became actions and the psychiatric said vocal tics do not mean he will do it and in fact he never has. SO they said it would be gone by today... I will get a new official copy.
SO, instead of immediately doing a new fba she is going to do a consult on the current one which is what I had orignially asked for... fo rher to look at what they did, then watch him and see if it matches. To see if they are really doing what the behavior plan asks for and if not then where are the issues and how can we change it.... or if so then are there things we should dump or add?? She is going to observe for two days, interview only the teacher and the DAPE instructor who lvoes Q, sees him daily and has known him 3rd thru 8th grade. (and her mom had a brain injury so she is the one who had cued me into what was going wrong with the aides last year and why I asked for an FBA to be re done last year)
Turns out the law person called the independent psychiatric and told her to pay close attention to the school psychiatric and the principal. After the meeting she said that they had locked eyes when school psychiatric was talikng and independent person actually rolled her eyes.. she was catching on I think... I hope...
ON TO OTHER NEWS>>> Q wore his auditory trainer two days and I was told that he actually chose not to take it off at all. He likes that it blocks out other people. She said she had 50 straight teaching mintues at a time and lots of other good moments the first day he used it. Lets hope no one makes it into a battle if it is working that well.
Marching on..........
SO, they had us go thru the old fba and behavior plan (well OLD in that we did it at the end of last school year... not really so many months doing the new bip) and there were plenty of opportunities for me to correct the psychiatric. Independent psychiatric asked if he had ever had a conditional procedure...guess what school psychiatric said... LAST year that Q went after him so he grabbed him and held him for 5 minutes. I said, really, do I have a copy of that?? He said I called you it was on a Friday and blah blah. IF he did, he never said that it was a restraint. I NEVER got a written report about that EVER. I am good about that stuff. Laywer was all over that and NOT happy and asked sp ed coordinator to get that right away so they are getting his documentation which during the meeting he admitted he likely never wrote up. This is the same guy that said that he grabbed Q by the arm and told him he was not going anywhere and was suggesting to the Speech Language Pathologist (SLP) to do that before lunch... I told him he was nuts that if he aggressed on Q like tha the owuld aggress on me like that too. YOu should have seen the eyes on the two other psychs!
HE is also the psychiatric that shoved Q into a chair in front of me... that is THREE times he has admitted to, how many more times did it happen I dont know about? They all admitted they ahve never held Q down that they have had to deflect him a little but he can always be herded to wherever he needs to go if needed.
I think this independent person is getting my point that they are egging him on. OUR psychiatric said to the team, what he feels is important to get on record is that this is not a child with up and down mental health issues that will get better with certain medications etc... He is permanently brain injured and we need to not have to keep coming to the table trying to explain that to people. I was beside myself happy that we are spending our waiver monies on this guy... HE IS SOOOO GOOD. THEy went thru the functions of behavior and she looked at it and said, yeah, I can see that these things can be a part but this is a complex kid and he is also probably just doing what his brain makes him do.... not really a function to it. OMGOSH! How many times have I tried to tell people that???
The law person said that she wanted it on record that I had called her in because I felt that there were some people in the school working at odds with the plan and being overly zealous about behaviors that were not hte target behaviors we were working on and things were being made worse because of it so she wanted it clear that when we did this ALL people had to come to the meetings and be a part of this. SP ed coordinator said oh and he WANTS to be a part of it and law person said in front of everyone, I highly doubt that. (NO he was not there today of course)
The documents that they passed out had words and things we had taken out before I signed the significant change. AT the end of the meeting I aske dht eteacher and coordinator about that and they said, yeah htey saw that too an it would be taken out. It said he had tried to expose himself... that has NEVER happened... they were at one time saying what IF he tried that. and they tried to put in a bunch of if his words became actions and the psychiatric said vocal tics do not mean he will do it and in fact he never has. SO they said it would be gone by today... I will get a new official copy.
SO, instead of immediately doing a new fba she is going to do a consult on the current one which is what I had orignially asked for... fo rher to look at what they did, then watch him and see if it matches. To see if they are really doing what the behavior plan asks for and if not then where are the issues and how can we change it.... or if so then are there things we should dump or add?? She is going to observe for two days, interview only the teacher and the DAPE instructor who lvoes Q, sees him daily and has known him 3rd thru 8th grade. (and her mom had a brain injury so she is the one who had cued me into what was going wrong with the aides last year and why I asked for an FBA to be re done last year)
Turns out the law person called the independent psychiatric and told her to pay close attention to the school psychiatric and the principal. After the meeting she said that they had locked eyes when school psychiatric was talikng and independent person actually rolled her eyes.. she was catching on I think... I hope...
ON TO OTHER NEWS>>> Q wore his auditory trainer two days and I was told that he actually chose not to take it off at all. He likes that it blocks out other people. She said she had 50 straight teaching mintues at a time and lots of other good moments the first day he used it. Lets hope no one makes it into a battle if it is working that well.
Marching on..........